Son-of-RFC1036:[Previous][Up to Table of Contents] [Next]
The Subject header's content (the "subject" of the article)
is a short phrase describing the topic of the article:
Subject-content = [ "Re: " ] nonblank-text
Encoded words MAY appear in this header.
If the article is a followup, the subject SHOULD begin with
"Re: " (a "back reference"). If the article is not a fol-
lowup, the subject MUST not begin with a back reference.
Back references are case-insensitive, although "Re: " is the
preferred form. A followup agent assisting a poster in
preparing a followup SHOULD prepend a back reference, UNLESS
the subject already begins with one. If the poster deter-
mines that the topic of the followup differs significantly
from what is described in the subject, a new, more descrip-
tive, subject SHOULD be substituted (with no back refer-
ence). An article whose subject begins with a back refer-
ence MUST have a References header referencing the precur-
sor.
NOTE: A back reference is FOUR characters, the
fourth being a blank. RFC 1036 was confused about
this. Observe also that only ONE back reference
should be present.
NOTE: There is a semi-standard convention, often
used, in which a subject change is flagged by mak-
ing the new Subject-content of the form:
new topic (was: old topic)
possibly with "old topic" somewhat truncated.
Posters wishing to do something like this are
urged to use this exact form, to simplify auto-
mated analysis.
For historical reasons, the subject MUST not begin with
"cmsg " (note that this sequence ends with a blank).
NOTE: Some old news software takes a subject
beginning with "cmsg " as an indication that the
article is a control message (see sections 6.6 and
7). This mechanism is obsolete and undesirable,
but accidental triggering of it is still possible.
The subject SHOULD be terse. Posters SHOULD avoid trying to
cram their entire article into the headers; even the sim-
plest query usually benefits from a sentence or two of
elaboration and context, and the details of header display
vary widely among reading agents.
NOTE: All-in-the-subject articles are sometimes
the result of misunderstandings over the interac-
tion protocol of a posting agent. Posting agents
might wish to give special attention to the possi-
bility that a poster specifying a very long sub-
ject might have thought he was typing the body of
the article.